A Clinical Review of 9 Years of Free Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: An Analysis of 675 Flaps and the Influence of New Techniques on Clinical Practice

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to review our 9-year experience with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstructions to help others more easily overcome the pitfalls we experienced. A chart review was conducted for all 543 patients who had 622 DIEP breast reconstructions in our clinic between January 2000 and January 2009. In this time, there were an additional 28 superior gluteal artery perforator and 25 superficial inferior epigastric artery reconstructions, bringing the total free flap reconstructions to 675. In the early years, the success rate was 90.7%, the average operative time was 7 hours and 18 minutes, and the complication rate was 33.3%; these have improved to 98.2%, 4 hours and 8 minutes, and 19.3%, respectively. We describe our selection criteria, preoperative vascular mapping, surgical techniques, and postoperative monitoring as they relate to these improvements in outcome, operative time, and complications. The DIEP flap is a safe and reliable option in breast reconstructions. By acquiring experience with the flap and introducing new and improving existing techniques we have improved the ease of the procedure and the success rate and have shortened the operative time.

Breast reconstruction - DIEP flap - learning curve - CT angiogram - operative time - complications - perforator flaps

REFERENCES

• 1 Website American Cancer Society .Available at: http://www.cancer.org Accessed October 1, 2009
• 2 Barlow W E, Taplin S H, Yoshida C K, Buist D S, Seger D, Brown M. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;  93 447-455
• 3 Jakesz R, Samonigg H, Gnant M Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group et al. Significant increase in breast conservation in 16 years of trials conducted by the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 556-564
• 4 Siesling S, van de Poll-Franse L V, Jobsen J J, Repelaer van Driel O J, Voogd A C. Explanatory factors for variation in the use of breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy in the Netherlands, 1990–2001.  Breast. 2007;  16 606-614
• 5 Thompson B, Baade P, Coory M, Carrière P, Fritschi L. Patterns of surgical treatment for women diagnosed with early breast cancer in Queensland.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;  15 443-451
• 6 Website European Parliament .Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu Accessed October 1, 2009
• 7 Busic V, Das-Gupta R, Mesic H, Begic A. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction, the learning curve explored.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 580-584
• 8 Bonde C T, Christensen D E, Elberg J J. Ten years' experience of free flaps for breast reconstruction in a Danish microsurgical centre: an audit.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;  40 8-12
• 9 Hofer S O, Damen T H, Mureau M A, Rakhorst H A, Roche N A. A critical review of perioperative complications in 175 free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions.  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  59 137-142
• 10 Gill P S, Hunt J P, Guerra A B et al.. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 1153-1160
• 11 Blondeel P N. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 104-111
• 12 Allen R J, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 32-38
• 13 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.  Br J Plast Surg. 1989;  42 645-648
• 14 Elliott L F, Seify H, Bergey P. The 3-hour muscle-sparing free TRAM flap: safe and effective treatment review of 111 consecutive free TRAM flaps in a private practice setting.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 27-34
• 15 Acosta R, Enajat M, Rozen W M, Smit J M, Wagstaff M J, Whitaker I S, Audolfsson T. Performing two DIEP flaps in a working day: an achievable and reproducible practice.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 63 648-654 [Epub 2009 March 16]
• 16 Masia J, Clavero J A, Larrañaga J R, Alomar X, Pons G, Serret P. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 594-599
• 17 Alonso-Burgos A, García-Tutor E, Bastarrika G, Cano D, Martínez-Cuesta A, Pina L J. Preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstruction with multislice-CT angiography: imaging findings and initial experience.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 585-593
• 18 Smit J M, Dimopoulou A, Liss A G et al.. Preoperative CT angiography reduces surgery time in perforator flap reconstruction.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;  62 1112-1117
• 19 Website Siemens medical. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com Accessed October 1, 2009
• 20 Darcy C M, Smit J M, Audolfsson T, Linde M, Acosta R. A contour preserving internal mammary vessel exposure in 463 microvascular breast reconstructions: outcome and surgical techniques.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun 11;  [Epud ahead of print]
• 21 Audolfsson T, Rozen W M, Wagstaff M J, Whitaker I S, Acosta R. A reliable and aesthetic technique for cephalic vein harvest in DIEP flap surgery.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009;  25 319-321
• 22 Smit J M, Audolfsson T, Whitaker I S, Werker P M, Acosta R, Liss A G. Measuring the pressure in the superficial inferior epigastric vein to monitor for venous congestion in DIEP breast reconstructions: a pilot study.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;  26 103-107
• 23 Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P et al.. Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years' experience.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  61 1309-1315